<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Piranha Internet Ltd</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.piranha-internet.co.uk/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.piranha-internet.co.uk/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 20:28:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Future Google Updates?</title>
		<link>http://www.piranha-internet.co.uk/blog/future-google-updates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.piranha-internet.co.uk/blog/future-google-updates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 20:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nat</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future google updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google penguin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google updates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.piranha-internet.co.uk/blog/?p=893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; There have been a fair few algorithm tweaks from the world&#8217;s favourite search engine of late, all in the name of providing more reliable results for its users. What will they call the new updates? Let&#8217;s get the old crystal ball out. I predict that the next few major Google algorithm changes will be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="post_image_link" href="http://www.piranha-internet.co.uk/blog/future-google-updates/" title="Permanent link to Future Google Updates?"><img class="post_image alignnone remove_bottom_margin frame" src="http://www.piranha-internet.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/orca.png" width="607" height="150" alt="What's next... Google Killer Whale update?" /></a>
</p><p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>There have been a fair few algorithm tweaks from the world&#8217;s favourite search engine of late, all in the name of providing more reliable results for its users.</p>
<p>What will they call the new updates? Let&#8217;s get the old crystal ball out.</p>
<p>I predict that the next few major Google algorithm changes will be named thus:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Google Skunk Update<br />
Google Zebra Update<br />
Google Badger Update<br />
Google Friesian Cow Update</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>They could go for a two part dog themed update:</p>
<p>Google Border Collie Update<br />
Google Dalmatian Update</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Perhaps they&#8217;ll chuck an animal in completely from left field.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Google Quagga Update (Was that brown and white? Never mind &#8211; it&#8217;s a good word.)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I wondered if I was the only person who had noticed the black / white animal theme to the Panda and Penguin updates.<br />
Turns out I wasn&#8217;t: <a href="http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/2012/04/penguins-pandas-and-spam/">Jessica Lee mentioned it</a>, and then <a href="http://www.seomoz.org/blog/penguins-pandas-and-panic-at-the-zoo">Dr Pete spotted it too</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Perhaps they won&#8217;t even go with animals at all&#8230;</p>
<p>Google Minstrel Update &#8211; that&#8217;s one for the *much* older generation I think.</p>
<p>Google&#8230; Michael Jackson Update? That&#8217;d be Black OR White of course.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Whatever they decide to go with next, I have to say that I am a big fan of both the Penguin and Panda updates. Not sure they&#8217;ve quite caught all of the dirty rascals with their all their link spam and duplicate content just yet, but I guess they&#8217;re on the case.</p>
<p>Meanwhile I&#8217;ll just sit tight and wait for the Google KILLER WHALE update!</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" title="Killer Whale" src="http://opencage.info/pics/files/800_9208.jpg" alt="Google Killer Whale Update" width="336" height="336" /></p>
<p>Has your traffic been affected by the Penguin update? Stay tuned to the blog for tips on how to deal with it. Coming up next week sometime&#8230;</p>
<p>PS I&#8217;m Nat, new inbound marketing person at Piranha. Talk to me <a href="http://plus.google.com/101251234232114966659">here</a>:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.piranha-internet.co.uk/blog/future-google-updates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO Jobs in Preston, well ‘job’ technically</title>
		<link>http://www.piranha-internet.co.uk/blog/seo-jobs-in-preston/</link>
		<comments>http://www.piranha-internet.co.uk/blog/seo-jobs-in-preston/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Careers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo job north west]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo job preston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo jobs in preston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo jobs north west]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo jobs preston]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.piranha-internet.co.uk/blog/?p=876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well this is rather an unusual blog post for me to be writing. It’s lump in the throat time people, as after a year at Piranha, the time has come for me to move on to pastures new. Yes, 12 months and some 40+ blog posts later, I’ve decided to continue my online marketing career [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="post_image_link" href="http://www.piranha-internet.co.uk/blog/seo-jobs-in-preston/" title="Permanent link to SEO Jobs in Preston, well ‘job’ technically"><img class="post_image alignnone remove_bottom_margin frame" src="http://www.piranha-internet.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/now-hiring.png" width="607" height="150" alt="SEO Jobs Preston" /></a>
</p><p>Well this is rather an unusual blog post for me to be writing. It’s lump in the throat time people, as after a year at Piranha, the time has come for me to move on to pastures new. Yes, 12 months and some 40+ blog posts later, I’ve decided to continue my online marketing career at <a title="Festive Lights" href="http://www.festive-lights.com/" target="_blank">festive-lights.com</a> who sell <a title="Solar Lights" href="http://www.festive-lights.com/solar-lights/" target="_blank">solar lights</a> amongst other things (see what I did there).</p>
<p>Of course I could go on about the past year and everything I’ve learnt and experienced, but I won’t. I will simply say thank you to Paul, Don and Pete at Piranha who gave me the opportunity to work here as an SEO Specialist, for which I remain grateful. Anyway, enough of the mush and on to the good stuff. My departure has opened up a vacancy for an enthusiastic SEO based in (or willing to relocate to) the North West of England.</p>
<h2>SEO Executive Job in Preston</h2>
<p>If you’re looking for an SEO job in Preston then you could do a lot worse than to apply for this position, where you’ll get to work with kick ass people like Martin, Nath, Tom and Steve on the web side, and creative designers like Katie and Sarah. Everyone is friendly and down to earth, and the management are laid back too, so the working atmosphere is nice and relaxed. Of course you would have to do a bit of work…</p>
<h2>The Work of an SEO Specialist</h2>
<p>If I typed everything that I did it’d be a pretty uninspiring, lengthy (err… honestly) blog post. Basically your job is to optimise websites for clients, as well as doing some optimisation work internally for Piranha, when time permits.</p>
<p>You will be responsible for designing and implementing SEO strategies: performing keyword research, creating SEO friendly content, link building, conducting site audits, reporting upon website performance, and liaising with clients. It is not an easy job by any means; there are plenty of clients to work with and in some fairly competitive industries. But you wouldn’t want it easy, would you?</p>
<p>You might also be required to do some social media work. Currently I’m managing the social media profiles for a number of our clients, so familiarity with social networking sites is a definite advantage. I’m not talking about how much you use Facebook on your lunch break either.</p>
<h2>Qualifications</h2>
<p>Ideally Piranha will be looking for someone to land on their feet. They will have a year’s experience in organic SEO, either agency or client side. PPC experience would be welcomed but is not essential.</p>
<h2>How much does the job pay?</h2>
<p>Well I’m not about to tell you how much money I earn, but I will tell you that I don’t drive a Ferrari, nor do I ride a penny farthing to work.  The salary, I’m reliably informed, is competitive and will be based upon experience and expertise.</p>
<p>You can learn more about the position <a title="SEO Specialist Preston" href="http://www.piranha-internet.co.uk/jobs/seo-specialist.php">here</a>. Just tell them <a title="Dan Almond" href="http://www.twitter.com/dan_almond" target="_blank">Dan</a> sent you.</p>
<p>Oh and this may or may not be my last blog post, my output in this regard tends to depend upon workload and priorities. If it is, you’ll probably see me somewhere on a guest blog very soon anyway. <em>Adios amigos</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.piranha-internet.co.uk/blog/seo-jobs-in-preston/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thinking of Making Your Twitter Account Private?</title>
		<link>http://www.piranha-internet.co.uk/blog/making-your-twitter-account-private/</link>
		<comments>http://www.piranha-internet.co.uk/blog/making-your-twitter-account-private/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 10:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[making Twitter private]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private Twitter accounts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protected Tweets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.piranha-internet.co.uk/blog/?p=859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First off I should apologise. It’s been a while since my last post. It is a challenge managing a client workload whilst still making regular blog contributions and even conducting SEO work on your own websites. But hey, I’m here now, and once again I’m talking about Twitter. It seems that ever since I got [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="post_image_link" href="http://www.piranha-internet.co.uk/blog/making-your-twitter-account-private/" title="Permanent link to Thinking of Making Your Twitter Account Private?"><img class="post_image alignnone remove_bottom_margin frame" src="http://www.piranha-internet.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/private-twitter.png" width="607" height="150" alt="Thinking of making your Twitter private" /></a>
</p><p>First off I should apologise. It’s been a while since my last post. It is a challenge managing a client workload whilst still making regular blog contributions and even conducting SEO work on your own websites. But hey, I’m here now, and once again I’m talking about Twitter.</p>
<p>It seems that ever since I got a Twitter account it’s been one of my favourite topics to blog about as well as one of my preferred social media sites to visit. Recently though I’ve grown concerned that I Tweet a lot of personal opinions and things that there are certain people that I would not want to see. So I set my Tweets to private…</p>
<h2>Most Tweets are Public</h2>
<p>By default, all Twitter accounts are public. Meaning that essentially, anyone can see what you Tweet. Take a second to consider if this is something you are comfortable with. I was actually quite happy with this arrangement, as other than a few football (that’s soccer to you American folk) related tweets, I’d like to think that my Tweets were relatively inoffensive. Problems for me arose when people that I had blocked from viewing my Tweets (no I’m not going to tell you why, don’t be so nosy :p) were still doing so.</p>
<p>It is incredibly easy to set-up a Twitter account, so even if you block one account, it is not too difficult for someone to create another that will be able to access your Tweets <em>if</em> your account is public.</p>
<h2>Setting Your Account to Private</h2>
<p><a href="http://www.piranha-internet.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/protected-tweets.png"><img class=" wp-image-867 alignright" style="border-image: initial; border-width: 1px; border-color: grey; border-style: solid;" title="protected-tweets" src="http://www.piranha-internet.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/protected-tweets.png" alt="protected tweets" width="362" height="106" /></a>An account set to private has protected Tweets – meaning that they can only be seen by manually approved followers. People have to send a request should they wish to follow someone whose account is set to private.</p>
<p>You can use the Account Settings page in order to change this setting. Before you do though, read on…</p>
<h2>Private Accounts cannot be Retweeted</h2>
<p>If you set your Tweets to private, <em>nobody</em> can retweet your Tweets. That witty comment you made about one of the trending topics can only be seen by those that follow you, and the only way that they can retweet it is using the manual “RT @&#8230;” format, which many people are actually too lazy to use.</p>
<h2>@ Replies to Non-followers cannot be seen</h2>
<p>This was what really disappointed me about my newly private account. If I replied to Tweets from people that didn’t follow me (e.g. celebrities), my tweets would not be visible to them. Surely by nominating someone with an @ mention, that should make it clear that I’m happy for said person to see that Tweet, should it not??</p>
<h2>Needless to say…</h2>
<p>I reset my Twitter account to public. Thankfully this is as simple as heading back to the settings page and un-ticking the option. As long as you don’t say anything too stupid or offensive, or don’t have a specific, important reason why you don’t want your Tweets shared with the masses then the default, public option is probably better.</p>
<p>But if you are concerned, you probably won’t want to read about these “<a href="http://admastblog.co.uk/2011/07/hilarious-social-media-sackings/">hilarious Social Media sackings</a>!”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.piranha-internet.co.uk/blog/making-your-twitter-account-private/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Search Plus Your World, Minus Your Facebook</title>
		<link>http://www.piranha-internet.co.uk/blog/google-search-plus-your-world-minus-your-facebook/</link>
		<comments>http://www.piranha-internet.co.uk/blog/google-search-plus-your-world-minus-your-facebook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 13:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google Plus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plus your world]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.piranha-internet.co.uk/blog/?p=840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wouldn&#8217;t it be great if when you searched for a hotel on Google, you could see what hotels your friends had recommended in that area? Remember they posted about it online that time? Well now Google is going to use information that your friends and associates have shared, to modify your search results – that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="post_image_link" href="http://www.piranha-internet.co.uk/blog/google-search-plus-your-world-minus-your-facebook/" title="Permanent link to Google Search Plus Your World, Minus Your Facebook"><img class="post_image alignnone remove_bottom_margin frame" src="http://www.piranha-internet.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/google-search-plus-minus.png" width="607" height="150" alt="Google Search plus Your World, Minus Your Facebook" /></a>
</p><p>Wouldn&#8217;t it be great if when you searched for a hotel on Google, you could see what hotels your friends had recommended in that area? Remember they posted about it online that time? Well now Google is going to use information that your friends and associates have shared, to modify your search results – that hotel is now much more likely to appear in your search results &#8211; woop!</p>
<p>Oh wait, they did share the link on Google+ right? What do you mean “<em>what’s Google+?</em>” It’s a bit like Face… let me guess, they posted their link on Facebook?  I can see a problem here. Allow me to investigate…</p>
<p><em>Put your hands up if you’re on Google+ &#8211; SEOs put your hands down, you don’t count –I don’t see many hands.  Now put your hands up if you’re on Facebook – lots of hands. It’s like an actual hand factory.</em></p>
<p>Google has introduced this great new feature whereby they are “transforming Google into a search engine that understands not only content, but also people and relationships.” The problem is that, currently, they’re only intent on using social data gathered from their own social network, Google+. Let’s take a closer look at what Google have told us they are going to be doing.</p>
<h2>Search, plus Your World</h2>
<p>On the <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2012/01/search-plus-your-world.html">Google Blog</a>, they have introduced 3 new features that they are bringing to search. Firstly <strong>Personal Search</strong>– this will enable you to find Google+ posts from your friends, including links and photos that they (or you) have shared.</p>
<div id="attachment_845" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 607px">
	<a href="http://www.piranha-internet.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Profiles-in-Search.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-845" title="Profiles-in-Search" src="http://www.piranha-internet.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Profiles-in-Search.png" alt="Profiles-in-Search" width="607" height="291" /></a>
	<p class="wp-caption-text">Google Profiles in Search, and Personal Search</p>
</div>
<p>Secondly, <strong>Profiles in Search</strong> – which helps when searching for a person. You’ll now get ‘personalised profile prediction(s)’. Start typing in the name of someone and if you have instant on, you won’t even need to finish typing before you’re greeted with a prediction based upon your Google+ connections, meaning that your friends are much more likely to show up, along with any websites that are related to them.</p>
<div id="attachment_846" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 607px">
	<a href="http://www.piranha-internet.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/People-and-Pages.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-846" title="People-and-Pages" src="http://www.piranha-internet.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/People-and-Pages.png" alt="People-and-Pages" width="607" height="272" /></a>
	<p class="wp-caption-text">People and Pages</p>
</div>
<p>Interestingly this feature will also give more prominence to noteworthy authors belonging to Google’s authorship pilot program – so if you’ve not set up your author account yet, what are you waiting for?!</p>
<p>Last, but not least is <strong>People and Pages</strong> – meaning when you search for a topic, you might be shown a list of people relevant to that topic, or who discuss it on Google+ on a regular basis.</p>
<h2>Search, minus Your Facebook</h2>
<p>I could throw some of those generic statistics at you now – Facebook has over 800 million users, etc. but I won’t. I will simply tell you that I have over 300 ‘friends’ on Facebook  (most of them don’t like me), whilst on Google+ I have exactly 0 people in my friends circle. None of my friends are on Google+ and I suspect a great deal of them don’t even know what it is.</p>
<p>How  can Google claim to be “bringing your world, rich with people and information, into search” when their only tool to do so is something that has less of my world in it than next door’s greenhouse (I kicked a football through the glass there a few years back and I suspect it’s still there)?</p>
<p>If and it’s a massive <strong>IF</strong>, Google were to use Facebook and Twitter data to bring my world into search, then it could be huge. I’m still not convinced that everyone would like it, but the <strong>Personal Search</strong> feature I think would be hugely beneficial.</p>
<h2>So why don’t they use Facebook data?</h2>
<p>Marketing Land  recently conducted <a href="http://marketingland.com/schmidt-google-not-favored-happy-to-talk-twitter-facebook-integration-3151">an interview with Google executive chairman Eric Schmidt</a> who stated that he would be happy to “have a conversation with them [Facebook and Twitter]” about their inclusion within personalised search results. Without saying too much, Schmidt intimated that Google might make use of both Facebook and Twitter data, were this content made readily available to them by the companies in question.</p>
<p>This came after Twitter had stated they thought Search, plus Your World was “bad for people, publishers, news organizations and Twitter users.” Google later issued an <a href="https://plus.google.com/u/0/116899029375914044550/posts/24uqWqvALud">official response</a> in which they declared their surprise, claiming that Twitter had ended a prior arrangement between the two companies that saw tweets featured within the search results.</p>
<p>Clearly there is a certain amount of politics involved, but if all parties were able to agree something, I can only think that this would be to the benefit of all concerned, with one notable exception – Google+. One would think that if all of this personal content was treated algorithmically, the site with the smallest user base (G+) would have the smallest representation within the search results. So is it really in Google’s best interests to have Facebook and Twitter represented in this way? I guess this depends on whether you believe that Google’s ultimate aim is to provide the best search experience, or to progress their own business.</p>
<h2>When will you see Search plus Your World?</h2>
<p>Google are rolling the feature out to google.com  (when used in English) over the next few days. There is no indication yet as to when it will hit the international sites. PLEASE NOTE: you can easily turn the feature off!</p>
<p>You can read about what many marketing experts think about Google Search plus Your World <a href="http://econsultancy.com/uk/blog/8646-google-search-plus-your-world-the-experts-view?utm_medium=twitter&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed">here</a>. Why not also post a nice comment below to let us know what you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.piranha-internet.co.uk/blog/google-search-plus-your-world-minus-your-facebook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Twitter Trending Topic Filters Please!</title>
		<link>http://www.piranha-internet.co.uk/blog/more-twitter-trending-topic-filters-please/</link>
		<comments>http://www.piranha-internet.co.uk/blog/more-twitter-trending-topic-filters-please/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 17:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trending topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TTs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter trending topics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.piranha-internet.co.uk/blog/?p=830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone that is a regular reader of this blog will know that I’m a big fan of Twitter. Twitter is open on my desktop throughout the working day, whether I’m using it for clients, for Piranha or on my own account. The Twitter app on my iPhone is also amongst my most frequented apps meaning [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="post_image_link" href="http://www.piranha-internet.co.uk/blog/more-twitter-trending-topic-filters-please/" title="Permanent link to More Twitter Trending Topic Filters Please!"><img class="post_image alignnone remove_bottom_margin frame" src="http://www.piranha-internet.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/onedirection.png" width="607" height="150" alt="One Direction Twitter" /></a>
</p><p>Anyone that is a regular reader of this blog will know that I’m a big fan of <a title="Twitter" href="http://www.twitter.com" target="_blank">Twitter</a>. Twitter is open on my desktop throughout the working day, whether I’m using it for clients, for Piranha or on my own account. The Twitter app on my iPhone is also amongst my most frequented apps meaning that yes, I also tweet from home… and from the bus and… well you get the idea.</p>
<p>There are several things that really bug me about Twitter though. These are namely <strong>Justin Bieber</strong>, <strong>One Direction</strong>, <strong>JLS</strong> and <strong>The Wanted</strong>. Yes, it would appear that Twitter is home to several million impressionable teenagers who like to stamp their mark all over it, blindly supporting their favourite popstars by way of continuous tweets. Now I’m happy that the youngsters have an interest and everything, but being the wrong side of 19 myself, I don’t really see that I should be subjected to it, and subjected to it I am thanks to these things known as…</p>
<h2>Trending Topics</h2>
<p>For the purposes of keeping this short and sweet, I’m going to assume that you know what ‘trending topics’ are (if you don’t you can read this ‘ere post to find out). Trending topics are one of my favourite features on Twitter. They alert me to things that I might otherwise have missed, be this national or international news, stories of bravery or courage, charitable causes, funny videos, great websites, inspirational people or any number of other things. Trending topics are great!</p>
<p>You know who isn’t great… Justin Bieber. Neither are One Direction. I don’t care about “Bieber vs One Direction”, the ‘beliebers’ or the ‘directioners’. The problem is that these people invade the trending topics on a regular basis massaging the egos of these ‘stars’ with ridiculous hash tags like #inzaynformalik, #beliebersarethebest and countless others that I have since managed to erase from my memory.</p>
<p>I wonder how many of the aforementioned charitable causes and stories of bravery or courage I am missing out on whilst such juvenile things are trending.</p>
<h2>The Solution</h2>
<p>Trending topics can already be filtered by location. There are separate trending topics in the UK, than in the US, for example. Why can’t we filter trending topics by the age of the people tweeting about them? Yes, this would involve data collection on Twitter’s part but if it is kept private then surely this isn’t a problem. In fact they could also use such information to restrict adult content or accounts (we’ve all had <em>those</em> @ mentions!) to people over the age of 18. Businesses on Twitter could also better analyse and cater to their target demographics, whilst Twitter themselves could charge more to companies for more targeted sponsored tweets and accounts.</p>
<p>As in the case of the current location filters, it would be up to the individual to choose whether or not they viewed the trending topics for everyone or just for a particular age range. Personally I would love the opportunity to filter out the Justin Bieber and JLS enthusiasts.</p>
<p><em>What do you guys think? Would you use such a filter if it existed? Post a comment below, unless you are over 19 and a huge Justin Bieber and One Direction fan who has been seriously offended by what I’ve written…</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.piranha-internet.co.uk/blog/more-twitter-trending-topic-filters-please/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

